![]() |
Quote:
|
Refurbished
I don't consider my Original with Danco loader a restoration, but more of a refurbishment. Most "restorations" aren't exact replications either as the factory didn't use automotive paint with perfect coverage. Most paint had sags and runs. It's a tractor, not a car. Just spending another $15 on the right paint isn't the only extra cost. I don't own a paint gun yet. I didn't have the time to put into what I should have done. I wanted it as a worker that looked nice and could be shown off too. I didn't weld up some holes that shouldn't be there and I wish I had, but was running out of time for the local show I wanted to be in. I don't go for awards and there are only a few that know the difference anyway. I'll never "restore" anything, but I'll get it close enough for me.
I don't take your comment as critism. But at shows and parades, others look at it as a "restoration". Sometimes I'll explain my theory as "refurbished" other times I just let them go with their own thoughts. http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x...l/IMG_5504.jpg |
Y.E. you are doing a bang up job on Your restoration. Like I said, some consider restoration to just be a new coat of paint. Not You. Your going for the guts first. My hat is off to you young man. 5-10 yrs from now You'll be turning out truly amazing equipment. It's already evident in your work. My post was more directed to the geezers !!:ThumbsUp: Dang klejeune ,that is one sweet ride. Yeah I new my post was going to be a little controversial . I reworded it several times , but had it diluted down to a point that it looked like a statement from Pelosi. Your reply klejeune is what I'm looking for. Again ,when I saw your tractor it was a shock !!! What a great job. As far as factory runs or paint defects. I have never seen that many. At least not on the sheet metal. Frames, yes. Believe me, I have painted more than one tractor with a spray bomb. They do turn out very nice [Factory Paint] .
|
I know a few people who get very offended when the word "restoration" or "restored" is used. If it satisfies the owner, then that should be good enough.:High5:
|
Quote:
|
My 126
Here are a few pics of my 126. It is the best tractor I've ever had.
http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/k...t/DSCN0381.jpg http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/k...t/DSCN0382.jpg http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/k...t/DSCN0383.jpg http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/k...t/DSCN0384.jpg |
Awesome looking 126 Butterbean!
|
Nice cubs one and all:beerchug:
I never get tired of looking at these machines in any condition. And yes sometimes beauty is in the eye of the beholder. That being said , I think what Eagle was getting at is the way many cubs are advertised as "restored or "just like new" etc. And they're anything but. It's very easy to fall for something that looks good on the outside and end up paying for it later. Sounds like someone I know:bigthink: I really admire you folks that can see the possibilities and take a neglected machine and turn it into something special. Even if it's less than perfect. Thanks guys and keep the pics coming! |
Heres all of mine.
72, 100, 107, 127, 383 hydro, 582 special, 3235 and a MTD yardking http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/f...e/DSC01990.jpg http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/f...e/DSC01776.jpg http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff11/lbuttke/2.jpg This one was taken last summer http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/f...e/DSC01561.jpg |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.