Only Cub Cadets

Only Cub Cadets (https://www.onlycubcadets.net/forum/index.php)
-   General Talk (https://www.onlycubcadets.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   The deer hunter... (https://www.onlycubcadets.net/forum/showthread.php?t=21009)

darkminion_17 11-07-2012 05:28 PM

The deer hunter...
 
3 Attachment(s)
Picked this green thing up today at the scrap yard. A John Queer 212 :banned:

It didn't take much to get it to run but will not charge,needs a stator.Runs great but their version of iso mounts were shot and one was missing.It has hydro lift on it.
Too bad it wont look like this after Saturday. :biggrin2:

I had my helper 107 drag its green butt to its final demise...

Cubcrazy 11-07-2012 05:30 PM

Nice pickup Lew even though it is a deere!:biggrin2:

MrGitrdone41 11-07-2012 05:39 PM

Those hydro lifs are pretty rare on the deeres. My buddy has one on his 214

darkminion_17 11-07-2012 05:47 PM

Thanks
Mikey!!

Yes I know they are Sam.I could buy a few cubs with the money I get from it. :biggrin2:

ol'George 11-07-2012 06:13 PM

Those 200 series (210-216) Deeres are good tractors, I still have one as a backup for my cub.
Their rubber mounting system for the engine is very good, putting the mounts @ the crankshaft centerline.
it makes for less vibration.
I wished cub would of done that.

Methos 11-07-2012 06:48 PM

I see the JD cries in green too.:beer2:

Sam Mac 11-07-2012 08:41 PM

SWEET looking JD! Nice score. Looking forward to seeing it restored!:beerchug:

ACecil 11-07-2012 10:37 PM

Nice find, Lew.

darkminion_17 11-07-2012 10:49 PM

I will be sure to show you pics of it taken apart.

red56turbo 11-07-2012 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Mac (Post 158348)
SWEET looking JD! Nice score. Looking forward to seeing it restored!:beerchug:

I think Lew's definition of restored and your's might be different. :Poof:


Nice find Lew. So the hydraulic lifts on the Does are like other JD stuff. Paint it green and the price triples...............................:BlahBlah:

zippy1 11-08-2012 12:17 AM

Quick Lew, put a bullet in it:beer2:

Shaner 11-08-2012 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ol'George (Post 158321)
Those 200 series (210-216) Deeres are good tractors, I still have one as a backup for my cub.
Their rubber mounting system for the engine is very good, putting the mounts @ the crankshaft centerline.
it makes for less vibration.
I wished cub would of done that.


I firmly believe these john deeres were far superior to cub.cadets quiet line series. For the iso mounts, ease of operation and looks. Quiet lines are UGLY compared to these

TheIHMan 11-08-2012 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaner (Post 158383)
I firmly believe these john deeres were far superior to cub.cadets quiet line series. For the iso mounts, ease of operation and looks. Quiet lines are UGLY compared to these

These look better than the the QL's? Really. :bigthink: No way these look better than a QL or any cub. As far as overall I have no experience with deere's but I doubt they are far superior to a QL.

Nice pickup tho Lew!:beerchug:

Shaner 11-08-2012 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheIHMan (Post 158422)
These look better than the the QL's? Really. :bigthink: No way these look better than a QL or any cub. As far as overall I have no experience with deere's but I doubt they are far superior to a QL.

Nice pickup tho Lew!:beerchug:


in my opinion they are. i had a 210 and a 1450 cub both at the same time, and the 210 was my favorite out of the two. i can't stand the way the quiet lines look with side panels and the way the front end is shaped. now if it were a 1X8, 1X9 series and 82 series, thats a different story. but the quiet lines in my opinion are the worst looking cubs they made. my personal favorite is the Original and the John Deere 110 with round fenders. both have that vintage look to them.

ACecil 11-08-2012 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheIHMan (Post 158422)
These look better than the the QL's? Really. :bigthink: No way these look better than a QL or any cub. As far as overall I have no experience with deere's but I doubt they are far superior to a QL.

Nice pickup tho Lew!:beerchug:

I totally agree with Adam!

cubcadet 11-08-2012 05:02 PM

nice lew:beerchug:

darkminion_17 11-08-2012 05:44 PM

It is not too nice anymore.It came apart pretty easy...nice parts...

zippy1 11-08-2012 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkminion_17 (Post 158462)
It is not too nice anymore.It came apart pretty easy...nice parts...

Ah, the color of money:biggrin2:

Wild Bill 11-08-2012 09:50 PM

Way to go Lew--turning JUNK, into cash!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...romtheKill.jpg

A Lawn Fawn that looks better, and works harder than a QL :ExtremeFunny: Better not tell my 1450 that!

zippy1 11-09-2012 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wild Bill (Post 158503)
Way to go Lew--turning JUNK, into cash!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...romtheKill.jpg

A Lawn Fawn that looks better, and works harder than a QL :ExtremeFunny: Better not tell my 1450 that!

:IH Trusted Hand:You speek the truth, Wild Bill:beerchug:

Cubcrazy 11-09-2012 06:46 AM

People give the quietlines a bad rap but they made 6 models and they were made for the most years out of the rest of the IH built garden tractors so alot of people liked the looks of them!:beerchug: My 0.02!

Wild Bill 11-09-2012 07:14 PM

I have NEVER understood the QL bashing!

People say they like looks of the 1X8/1X9 series and the X82 series, but don't like the QLs...........

The nose of the WF compared to the QL is different by way of a divider between the headlights.....and of course the engine sidecovers that people complain about. WFs have flex coupler in the driveline (as does an Original) but nobody complains about them....

The X82s don't divide the grill from the lights, otherwise the fronts are not that much different than a QL....and they have sidecovers and flex couplings on both ends of the driveshaft like a QL, yet nobody complains about them on an X82.

I've never heard one complaint about the ISO mounts on a 1282, etc.

Virtually all generators all use ISO mounts, but I don't remember anybody complaining about them.

My 1450 has absolutely NO problem with a 50A/C deck, a QA42A snowthrower, a #2 tiller, and a 12" Brinly plow.

I have seen first hand at a Plowday event, a JD 420 struggle (jumping over the furrow, getting hung up, etc) with a 12" Cat O plow, while my 1450 had no problems with my sleeve hitch mounted 12" Brinly.

My QL 1450 -VS- a Lawn Fawn= NO comparison!

Sam Mac 11-09-2012 07:55 PM

I have no issues with QL's or Deere's. I like some of both, deal with it.:biggrin2:

darkminion_17 11-10-2012 06:20 PM

3 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by ol'George (Post 158321)
Those 200 series (210-216) Deeres are good tractors, I still have one as a backup for my cub.
Their rubber mounting system for the engine is very good, putting the mounts @ the crankshaft centerline.
it makes for less vibration.
I wished cub would of done that.

Well it looks like the JD system has its flaws.ISO's didn't seem to work here... :bigthink:

Wild Bill 11-13-2012 11:32 PM

Those ISO mounts were asked to do a tough job....hold up a cast iron Kohler engine for many years/hours.

The ISO mounts in that Dear John are shot!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.