![]() |
Rear weight bracket/cargo rack
6 Attachment(s)
had this weight bracket I made a while back to hold 2 cement blocks for help with plowing snow. This summer I got a FEL 128 so it ended up on it and I've been messing around in the woods with it clearing trails and cutting firewood so i decided i needed somewhere to carry my saw, fuel can, oil, tools, ax etc. So heres what i came up with just painted her up will get it all mounted up tomorrow. let me know what you think
|
Looks like it should work! That second to last pic it looks like a BBQ grill! Put done burgers on and grill supper while you mow or move dirt!
|
3 Attachment(s)
finished pics or at least finished for now
|
Looks like a well thought out solution to me. :beerchug:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Good idea but, too much weight abd every time you hit a bump you'll be popping wheelies!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In your pics I don't see 5, or even 4 bolt wheel hubs on front, so your still running on a 3/4" axle shaft. Even if you upgraded to a 1" one, it's still too small for all the weight of a loader with a load on it. How about the front pivot rod on the axle? Is it larger? As far as I'm concerned, a FEL on a stock GT is just an accident waiting to happen. Just not big enough for that kind of load. SGT.... they are a little better to put one one. If nothing else, longer WB makes a huge difference. I just hope you don't find the weak point when you have 7-800# hanging on the front. It is a tractor, but not a big tractor. |
Quote:
as far as those front spindles, i have about 300lbs of rear weight on it plus my 200lbs and had all of that in the air on the front axle with an over loaded bucket didnt break anything. I don't understand why an SGT would be much better, spindles are the same size and the frame is a little longer. same rearend same thickness frame I don't see much advantage. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.