![]() |
Don't need it....but I want it....BAAAAAD
1 Attachment(s)
Yea, I have no use for it..... but it's for sale.
Could someone out there spot me 10 grand, I'll come up with the rest. http://pittsburgh.craigslist.org/grd/4675276435.html |
Oh boy, that'd be nice to have around! And don't say you have no use for it; I bet you $10k once you get it, you'd have all kinds of jobs for it! Put in an in-ground swimming pool, trench some cable to an out-building, add a nice pond, bigger driveway, plow driveways for money in the winter, come on; if you don't have things to do with it, you aren't trying hard enough!! :biggrin2: :beerchug:
|
Quote:
|
I was looking at the same one last night wishing I had the money.
|
1 Attachment(s)
I'll be honest, I've run small tractor/backhoe combo's like that quite a bit. I wouldn't buy one. If I wanted/needed a small backhoe like that I'd just get a mini-excavator. You can get them used for about the same money or less, and they don't usually power out like those tractor mounted backhoes do. All the mini-excavators I've used dug just like the big ones, just on a smaller scale.
Attachment 56668 |
Just my 2 cents but I'd go Orange and skip the back hoe. If you need a hoe it's better to rent it for the few jobs that you need one for around the home. As Jon mentioned the small track mounted units work great. BTDT.
|
Quote:
|
I get what everyone is saying about a dedicated backhoe being a better machine for frequent/heavy jobs, but if a good deal came along, especially for the homeowner or someone with a small property, would you honestly say no to a backhoe on a smaller tractor? For what I'd use it for, I'd love to have one on the back of a tractor instead of a separate piece of machinery I'd have to maintain (ok, so that's not true of me, the more machines the better, but you get my point :biggrin2:).
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.