View Single Post
  #5  
Old 11-18-2014, 10:29 AM
jimbob200521's Avatar
jimbob200521 jimbob200521 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Sterling, IL
Posts: 3,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Group_44 View Post
Do all the 1864's have dual hydraulics or was that an option? Its good to hear the 48" deck is good design, I was attracted to this unit because it had a smaller deck. I have 2 supers one with a 60" and the other with a 54" deck and they leave me with a lot of trimming because I can't get around trees close to the fence line.
Dual hydraulic was an option, but not standard. As far as options go, it's a good one to have

Edit: The biggest thing you will notice about the 1864 is the tight turning; I have a Super with a 54" and an 1864 with a 54" and without a doubt, the 1864 is able to negotiate much tighter areas easier. It's an excellent choice for a mowing machine.
__________________
-Ryan

Reply With Quote