Thread: Engine torque
View Single Post
  #8  
Old 02-09-2022, 09:56 PM
Farmall450's Avatar
Farmall450 Farmall450 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Marengo, Illinois
Posts: 1,112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ironman View Post
I would add that as things progressed in lawn care considerations, the higher hp/rpm became desirable to give the mower decks more cutting rpm for a nicer cut.
Back in the early Cub Cadet days, I don't think grass cutting was thought of as the primary need for one, so more grunt factor was built into them to do the hard work.
I'd be curious to hear from a Cadet engineer whether blade speed was a driving factor, and what they ballparked. You'd think gearing (pulley size) alone could handle this, and I somewhat suspect that's why they increased PTO size in the 90s. Not to mention belt life and other fringe benefits.
__________________
Why Farm Half When You Can Farmall?
1282 | 44C Deck, Chains, 42" Blade, Cast Weights, 020" Over K301 * 1711 | 50C Deck, #1 Rear Rototiller w/ Extensions, Sleeve Hitch, KT17S Series II 24302 --> CH18S * 1811 | 46 GT Deck, 42" Blade, Chains, M18 Magnum, Sleeve Hitch * 1782 | 60" #375 Deck, Kubota D640 Diesel * 1862 | #450 Snowblower, M18 Magnum * 782 | Y/W KT17 Series II, Sleeve Hitch * 984 | Y/W Onan/Linamar 20HP, Sims Cab, CAT 0 3 PT w/ Rear PTO, 60" #374 Deck
Reply With Quote