Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

P&K Cub Cadet Machtech Direct

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Cub Cadets > Implements and Attachments

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2009, 12:34 PM
medic75 medic75 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Norhtwest PA
Posts: 23
Default Converting a 451 blower into a 450?

After driving 250 (500 round trip) miles for a 450 snow blower, I found it was a 451. The only difference I can find in these two models are the gear ratio. After attempting to order the 450 gears and shaft, I found that they are no longer available and were quite expensive also. This created plan B - a smaller pulley. With the gear ratio of the 451 being about 2.58:1 and the 450 being about 1.86:1 (0.535) it makes sense to me that I should be able to go from the stock 7 inch pulley to a smaller 5 inch pulley and solve the gear reduction problem. This change, if my calculations are correct, should give me a 40% increase in speed on the input shaft and create a speed which is slightly faster than the 450, simulating a gear ratio of 1.84:1 (0.542).

Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-23-2009, 02:22 PM
Matt G.'s Avatar
Matt G. Matt G. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 5,661
Default

Only problem I can think of is that the belt may slip because it has less contact area. It might be easier to put a different PTO clutch on. What model of tractor are we talking about here?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-23-2009, 02:46 PM
medic75 medic75 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Norhtwest PA
Posts: 23
Default

It's a 782. I really don't want to touch the tractor side because I use it to mow too and I don't want to screw everything else up.

I had thought about the belt slipping but then I figured that the belt would have contact with at least half of the pulley so there shouldn't be a problem. Then after figuring it out, you may be right. I am losing almost 30% of my belt contact area. Is this the reason for the larger PTO's on the newer tractors? I am far from an expert when it comes to gear ratios, but I think my calculations are correct.

I have read about people swapping gears, but I have never seen where anyone has swapped a pulley. I can't even find where someone has tried it. I couldn't figure out why considering that it is probably the easier alternative and definitely the cheaper alternative.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-23-2009, 10:34 PM
Matt G.'s Avatar
Matt G. Matt G. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 5,661
Default

The PTO clutch pulley on a 782 is pretty small, and so is the pulley on the QA36A and QA42A, so not much belt contact area there. If you use an OEM belt, you should be alright. I've destroyed 2 Gates green belts with my 782 and QA36A. It's cheap to change the pulley, so I'd suggest trying that first. If all else fails, change the gears.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-23-2009, 11:04 PM
medic75 medic75 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Norhtwest PA
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt G. View Post
If all else fails, change the gears.
That was my original plan. It was kinda ruined when my local CC dealer told me that the entire input side of the gear box is no longer produced or available for the 450. I'm stuck with the 451 gears unless I can find some old stock somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-24-2009, 07:00 AM
Matt G.'s Avatar
Matt G. Matt G. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 5,661
Default

Either that, or someone trying to turn a 450 into a 451...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-17-2010, 09:31 PM
Iowa Farmboy Iowa Farmboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rockford, Iowa
Posts: 118
Default

well what did you do?
Did you change the pulley? If so how did it work?
I have the same problem 451 that I need to run on a 2072
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-18-2010, 08:04 AM
ol'George's Avatar
ol'George ol'George is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 6,829
Default

A 5" pulley should do the job as there is sufficient wrap of the belt, so slip is not an issue.
IIRR my Qa42A on my 782 uses a pulley similar to that.
I had an issue last year with a bad gear box gear, and went to a tiller box with a different ratio.
In order to use it, I just changed the auger drive sprocket to get the correct rpm,as it is a single stage thrower.
I have since purchased a used thrower gear box from evilbay and returned to origional gearing.
I found no difference in performance with either setup.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-25-2010, 11:00 AM
Frank1541 Frank1541 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 296
Default

Medie75,

If you are still trying to make this work, I have a 450 gearbox and I need the 451 gearbox for my application. I have a 450 that I need to adapt for the newer large pulley on the Cyclops GT. The gearbox is in good shape. How about a trade?

John
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.