Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

P&K Cub Cadet Machtech Direct

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Attention Guest, We have turned off the forum to guest. This is due to bots attacking the site. It is still free to register.

-->
Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Cub Cadets > CCC/MTD Cub Cadet built Tractors (GT)

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-03-2011, 09:32 AM
cheelo8668 cheelo8668 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5
Default 1862 question

i have just purchased a well used(1700hrs) 1862 for $150. it was not running at time of purchase, brought home- no spark. stole a coil from one of my spare m-18.
fired right up, very little smoke.does have a semi-stripped out heli-coil on one head. seems to move well, no creep. question i have is can i transfer my tiller set-up from my 1450 over to the 1862 and be cost effective. the 1862 has no hitch. also i have very little knowledge on these newer cubs. what problems should i look for to determine if i should invest any time or money into it? i do have 2 m-18's that run well, if i need to replace. thank- you
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-03-2011, 09:44 AM
Methos Methos is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 10,941
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheelo8668 View Post
i have just purchased a well used(1700hrs) 1862 for $150. it was not running at time of purchase, brought home- no spark. stole a coil from one of my spare m-18.
fired right up, very little smoke.does have a semi-stripped out heli-coil on one head. seems to move well, no creep. question i have is can i transfer my tiller set-up from my 1450 over to the 1862 and be cost effective. the 1862 has no hitch. also i have very little knowledge on these newer cubs. what problems should i look for to determine if i should invest any time or money into it? i do have 2 m-18's that run well, if i need to replace. thank- you


Sounds like you got a pretty good deal! If your 1450 and 1862 are the same size the tiller could be mounted on it but you'll have to do something about the alum. rear end. The tiller would pull the bolts right out of the axle housing unless you put a cast iron rear end in there. I'm not 100% sure that it could be done but with everything with the know how, tools or the cash anything can be done. It would be a custom setup for sure. If it was me I'd keep using the 1450 for tilling duties. I can see desire of using the 1862 with power steering and tilt steering wheel you could sit and till all day long with out using very much energy.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-03-2011, 10:08 AM
Cubcrazy's Avatar
Cubcrazy Cubcrazy is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 9,201
Default

I would leave the tiller on the 1450.
Alot of work to make the 1862 tiller ready.
On top of what duke said you would need a three point hitch set up and pulley changes as well.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-03-2011, 09:03 PM
jbollis's Avatar
jbollis jbollis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 647
Default

I don't know why everyone tries to scare people into thinking the aluminum rear ends are weak and cannot handle any kind of work load. I have never heard of anyone pulling the bolts out of the rear. I am not saying it has not been done, but I would bet if it has they were doing something they should not have been doing or the bolts were not tight.

I did some looking and figuring and this is what I found.

Fastener = 3/8-16 x.750. Using about .500

A 3/8-16 thread internal thread has around a .03392 shear area at .500 of use. I don't know the specs for the housing, so I used the lowest aluminum tensile strength of 26000 psi for this figure.

.03392 x 26000 = 881.92 psi per bolt, x 5 bolts = 4409.60 psi on only the bolts themselves would be needed to pull (strip) the threads out of the aluminum housing.

I understand that these numbers are not exact as I don't know the exact specs on the housing. But you can see that someone would have a very difficult time pulling the 5 bolts out under normal use. A person would have to be pulling more than 2 tons, that is more than you can legally haul in the bed of most pickups.

I can however see problems occurring if the bolts are not tight. But that is a another story.
__________________
Sold everything but one.
1211-snow pusher, cab ,54 inch plow, loaded tires (all 4) Gilson wheel weights, X-trac fronts- soon to have power steering and dual hydraulics
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-03-2011, 09:20 PM
rkeithley rkeithley is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Methos View Post


Sounds like you got a pretty good deal! If your 1450 and 1862 are the same size the tiller could be mounted on it but you'll have to do something about the alum. rear end. The tiller would pull the bolts right out of the axle housing unless you put a cast iron rear end in there. I'm not 100% sure that it could be done but with everything with the know how, tools or the cash anything can be done. It would be a custom setup for sure. If it was me I'd keep using the 1450 for tilling duties. I can see desire of using the 1862 with power steering and tilt steering wheel you could sit and till all day long with out using very much energy.

I have a no. 2 tiller on the back of my 1864 (same tractor only with a command engine) and never had a problem with pulling the bolts out. The sleeve hitch off the 1450 will work with the 1862, you wll need the Frankenstein bolts to use it. I would change the pull on the gear box to the wider belt. The 1862 will be a better tractor to use than the 1450.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-03-2011, 09:22 PM
Methos Methos is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 10,941
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbollis View Post
I don't know why everyone tries to scare people into thinking the aluminum rear ends are weak and cannot handle any kind of work load. I have never heard of anyone pulling the bolts out of the rear. I am not saying it has not been done, but I would bet if it has they were doing something they should not have been doing or the bolts were not tight.

I did some looking and figuring and this is what I found.

Fastener = 3/8-16 x.750. Using about .500

A 3/8-16 thread internal thread has around a .03392 shear area at .500 of use. I don't know the specs for the housing, so I used the lowest aluminum tensile strength of 26000 psi for this figure.

.03392 x 26000 = 881.92 psi per bolt, x 5 bolts = 4409.60 psi on only the bolts themselves would be needed to pull (strip) the threads out of the aluminum housing.

I understand that these numbers are not exact as I don't know the exact specs on the housing. But you can see that someone would have a very difficult time pulling the 5 bolts out under normal use. A person would have to be pulling more than 2 tons, that is more than you can legally haul in the bed of most pickups.

I can however see problems occurring if the bolts are not tight. But that is a another story.
So when you going to hook a tiller up to a alum rear end and prove your point? I sure don't feel like telling someone that they will not have problems when I feel other wise. There's a reason why xtreme motor works and others put side tabs on their products. My gut feeling is that it's not for looks.

http://www.xtrememotorworks.com/Part...CC-03-001M.htm

http://www.xtrememotorworks.com/Part.../CC-29-010.htm
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-03-2011, 09:53 PM
jbollis's Avatar
jbollis jbollis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Methos View Post
So when you going to hook a tiller up to a alum rear end and prove your point? I sure don't feel like telling someone that they will not have problems when I feel other wise. There's a reason why xtreme motor works and others put side tabs on their products. My gut feeling is that it's not for looks.

http://www.xtrememotorworks.com/Part...CC-03-001M.htm

http://www.xtrememotorworks.com/Part.../CC-29-010.htm


Not to start an argument here but the the numbers do not lie, nor was Extreme involved in the design of the aluminum rear end.

No offense to Extreme's stuff but, just because someone over builds a part for (extreme) use, does not mean that the stock part will not work for normal use.
__________________
Sold everything but one.
1211-snow pusher, cab ,54 inch plow, loaded tires (all 4) Gilson wheel weights, X-trac fronts- soon to have power steering and dual hydraulics
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-03-2011, 10:05 PM
Methos Methos is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 10,941
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbollis View Post
Not to start an argument here but the the numbers do not lie, nor was Extreme involved in the design of the aluminum rear end.

No offense to Extreme's stuff but, just because someone over builds a part for (extreme) use, does not mean that the stock part will not work for normal use.
Not take it as a argument but there's a reason why the gear box tillers were never used on a alum rear end. I have not heard of anyone using a tiller gear box on an alum rear end if you have please share with us. As you and I both wasn't part of the design team I guess neither one of us has a leg to stand on.

Maybe there's someone that has done it and would like to share their experence with us.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-03-2011, 10:09 PM
jbollis's Avatar
jbollis jbollis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 647
Default

Perhaps the above poster could share their experience with us.
__________________
Sold everything but one.
1211-snow pusher, cab ,54 inch plow, loaded tires (all 4) Gilson wheel weights, X-trac fronts- soon to have power steering and dual hydraulics
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-03-2011, 10:15 PM
Methos Methos is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 10,941
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkeithley View Post
I have a no. 2 tiller on the back of my 1864 (same tractor only with a command engine) and never had a problem with pulling the bolts out. The sleeve hitch off the 1450 will work with the 1862, you wll need the Frankenstein bolts to use it. I would change the pull on the gear box to the wider belt. The 1862 will be a better tractor to use than the 1450.
Got pics? How long have you been using this setup?

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.