Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

P&K Cub Cadet Machtech Direct

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Attention Guest, We have turned off the forum to guest. This is due to bots attacking the site. It is still free to register.

-->
Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Cub Cadets > Implements and Attachments

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-12-2015, 12:50 AM
tukn20s tukn20s is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 63
Default Mower deck: front runners or wheels

I am in the process of rebuilding a 44" deck for my 682. As with most of them the front runners have been broken and poorly repaired. I am thinking about putting wheels on the front rather than the runners and was looking for some opinions on what everyone prefers. To be honest I have never been overly happy with the way my mower cuts. I'm hoping a rebuild with fixing all worn parts will help but I'm thinking it's partly due to design. So any improvements I can make would be great.

If I stay with runners, does anyone have a source for a similar shaped piece of stock? Bending it to shape is not an issue, but I have never ran across anything with the same profile.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-12-2015, 06:03 AM
R Bedell R Bedell is offline
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,693
Default

Just my two cents....

I was never a fan of either the "runners" or front wheels. But if I had to choose between those two, I would go with the wheels.

You "may" want to consider front caster wheels as seen on the newer decks. Yes, it will require some fabrication, but I think you would be much happier.
__________________
[B]Roland Bedell[/B]

CC Models: 100, 105, 1450, 782, (2) 784, & 2072

[SIZE="4"][B][COLOR="Red"]Buy:[/COLOR][COLOR="Blue"] Made in the USA[/COLOR][/B] [/SIZE]:American Flag 1:
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-12-2015, 09:51 AM
Berwil's Avatar
Berwil Berwil is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 1,311
Default

I agree with Roland that casters would be best, but it is a lot of work. I have been toying with the idea of a spherical wheel like Adam did on the 48" deck of his 149. He did a nice write up of his bracket, with dimensions. It's a different deck, but should help you get close.
http://www.onlycubcadets.net/forum/s...ad.php?t=34335

If you wanted to replace the hoop, I think round bar would be easiest. If you have a torch 3/4" round is not hard to bend.

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-2015, 12:03 PM
IHinIN's Avatar
IHinIN IHinIN is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,848
Default

Bill, thanks for posting that for me. I'm very happy with the front wheels. The skids were worn halfway through and bent to hell and that helped with my decision to go with the wheels.
__________________
Adam

1964 Model 100 w/ K301 12hp and custom hydraulics
1972 Model 149 turned 129 w/ K301 12hp, triple hydraulics, 66 series clone
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-12-2015, 01:17 PM
tukn20s tukn20s is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 63
Default

Thanks for the link. I was looking at the build thread for that deck yesterday. So you guys think swivel casters would be better than mounting the wheels straight forward?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-12-2015, 01:19 PM
tukn20s tukn20s is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IHinIN View Post
Bill, thanks for posting that for me. I'm very happy with the front wheels. The skids were worn halfway through and bent to hell and that helped with my decision to go with the wheels.
Very nice work on the deck rebuild. Excellent fab skills and a very nice finished product.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-12-2015, 03:08 PM
DoubleO7's Avatar
DoubleO7 DoubleO7 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 1,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tukn20s View Post
Thanks for the link. I was looking at the build thread for that deck yesterday. So you guys think swivel casters would be better than mounting the wheels straight forward?
IMHO I think the gauge wheels used by IHinIN are about the best, nice and rounded across the face to go sideways without digging in so much.

I think a caster would be great if you were going forward ALL the time.
But every time you back up they will want to flip around.
And at that time be digging a divot.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-12-2015, 03:16 PM
Berwil's Avatar
Berwil Berwil is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 1,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tukn20s View Post
..... So you guys think swivel casters would be better than mounting the wheels straight forward?
Skids and straight wheels are great when your going in a straight line. When you are turning into a hill or incline and the skid or wheel is sliding sideways, that's when they can dig in and cause a divot. The caster wheels rotate and ride up the incline instead of digging in and won't cause a divot. The radius on the bottom of the skid and the spherical wheels are an attempt to minimize the number/size of divots. The larger decks use the casters, I don't know that there is ample real estate on a 44" deck to mount a decent set of casters. Unless your yard is very hilly or uneven, I think spherical wheels will give you the results you want over your current bent up skid. Growing up I ran an off topic mower with spherical wheels on a 46" deck and don't recall much of a divoting issue. My $.02

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-12-2015, 10:28 PM
Moark Willy Moark Willy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Missouri
Posts: 61
Default

Between fixed wheels or casters, the casters will do less damage. Keep in mind that when the deck is mounted properly and the wheels mounted at the correct height, their only purpose is to keep the deck from scrubbing. They are not in contact with the ground unless there is a ground swell and they are more likely to turn and not scrub like the runners or fixed wheels are. Only front mounted decks rely on the wheels to keep them up. The deck height adjustment is what keeps the deck in place on other machines.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-14-2015, 05:45 PM
tukn20s tukn20s is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 63
Default

Thanks for all the input everyone. I'm thinking I will probably go with wheels. I will just have to decide between straight wheels or casters. Looks like I will have to wait until winter dies down so I can pull the snowthrower off and see what kind of clearance I have. If I do fixed wheels, I may just use the pre-made Cub Cadet bracket kit to save some time.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.