Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

P&K Cub Cadet Machtech Direct

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Attention Everyone, we have 2 new Sponsors!
Machtech Direct and P&K Cub Cadet (See Links above)


Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Cub Cadets > Tractor pullers using Cub Cadets!

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-16-2009, 03:30 PM
try109's Avatar
try109 try109 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 11
Default Question which is best to try to pull with

I'm really new to this. Is a tractor with hydrostatic drive not as good to try to pull with than a gear transmission? It seams like you would probally lose some power with the hydrol.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-16-2009, 04:56 PM
ACecil's Avatar
ACecil ACecil is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 23,523
Default

A gear drive is better to use for pulling, rather than a hydro.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-16-2009, 05:05 PM
Jim H.'s Avatar
Jim H. Jim H. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Apollo PA
Posts: 151
Default

I have an unmentionable brand tractor about the size of a super GT that IH has.
18 Hp briggs. V twin , Hydrostatic, heavy enough to do all the normal and not so normal things I do with it. I have pushed full blades of brush wider and higer than the hood, the length of my yard, Last summer I pushed 40 ton of limestone in 2 and a half hours great powerful machine.

I have pulled a weight transfer sled, the track was a short one 40 ' the sled could stop the big boys.

I did fairly well on that track , but when it came to pulling the Big Boys sled I looked like a fool. after the first 30 ft, the hydro fluid would be so hot it foamed and I lost all power to the ground. I would let off and hit er again only to bury the tractor in place. {Big Boys tried to tell me that}. After about four tries and $20.00 hookup fees, plus the gas involved in going to where they were having their event, I realized I wasn't going to make any money with this set up.

So I'd Say you better go with a gear drive.
Of course you will have to make some minor modifications to have a good running stock er. Like a heavier clutch spring. Figure the weight positioning needed to make best traction. tire inflation is important too.

One word of warning The last sled I pulled , These guys have it down to a science. I even saw, after tractor /driver weigh in. the drivers would go to the concession stand and pig out just to add more weight. Took the fun side out for me, some said they didn't eat for three days prior to weigh in time.
__________________
Every time I find the key to success, someone changes the lock
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-17-2009, 09:46 AM
try109's Avatar
try109 try109 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 11
Smile Answer to Jim

Thanks for the info. I don't think that I will get all that competetive. I just want to have some fun.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-23-2009, 09:41 PM
Cubmonkey's Avatar
Cubmonkey Cubmonkey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Frenchville, PA
Posts: 65
Default

Gear drives are better for pulling. i have a 1200 that i pull. Ive seen some hydros outpull the gear drives in the lawn stock class. So if your just ut to have fun i think you will be safe running a hydro.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-27-2009, 02:59 PM
truckntran truckntran is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 392
Default

Well, as a 1250 and 1450 hydro owner I can tell ya my experience from all two pulls i have gone to.. The first was a stoneboat pull.. I got third out of about 8 tractors, and did so by slowly advancing the hydro lever at full throttle until the sled moved, then just motoring down the track. Of course I was running at about 1600 lbs with every weight I could find strapped to the poor beast. Stock Turf tires, not ag tires... it was a very loose track but I was beat only by 16 HP Gravelys with as much weight as they could carry too.

Second pull, transfer sled at a JD dealership.. Lots of expensive toys there, mostly gear drive Cubs and belt Drive WHeel Horse and Sears trctors. Weight was limited to 1300 Lbs, and I was in the same class as 20 HP tractors. Had I known beforehand I would have stuck to the 1250 instead of trying to get the 1450 setup to pull.

End result.....transfer sled was winner hands down... I got 54 feet, next worse pull was 70 feet.. and the hot rods were doing full pulls at 100 feet with 12 alleged HP in a 122. I found it very difficult to keep the hydro lever where it was using the power band without slowing down the speed down the track to where intertia was not on my side. I was amazed to actually pull a small wheelie, didn't think the turfs had enough traction but the hard track hooked up well.

This was a 14 HP in a 1450, totally stock with a very recent replacement new engine.

Long story short, don't bother with hydros....they are great tractors but just not competitive in pulling. (Unless you spend stupid money on your engine..)
__________________
Quietlines and narrow frames, mostly projects but I mow with a 1200 and have a 122 set up for pulls. Wandering the country bringing towers to wind farms everywhere, and bringing yellow stuff home to Texas. Also into flatfender jeeps.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.