Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

Machtech Direct

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Attention Guest, We have turned off the forum to guest. This is due to bots attacking the site. It is still free to register.

-->
Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Off Topic > General Talk

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-20-2016, 05:32 PM
cubs-n-bxrs's Avatar
cubs-n-bxrs cubs-n-bxrs is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 1,936
Default

This is getting almost as good as a Hytran debate. My truck is better than yours.
__________________
1641, 1541, 682 with 18hp command engine and hydraulics from a 782. 1872 with a power angle blade.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-20-2016, 05:39 PM
john hall's Avatar
john hall john hall is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 3,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cubs-n-bxrs View Post
This is getting almost as good as a Hytran debate. My truck is better than yours.
Cars are SO much simpler. You get 3-4 option packages, that's about it. Trucks have a ridiculous number of configurations. Its practically impossible to compare these things! I'm trying to price one for my son. Been pulling my hair out just loading options and stuff into the online appraisal sites. I guess as soon as he gets his license I'll finish pulling it out!
__________________
2072 w/60" Haban
982 with 3 pt and 60" Haban
1811 with ags and 50C
124 w/hydraulic lift
782 w/mounted sprayer
2284 w/54" mowing deck
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-20-2016, 08:03 PM
Cubfan79 Cubfan79 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Illinois
Posts: 78
Default

My 2 cents is a 1st gen dodge cummins w250 pickup. Strong and dependable
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-21-2016, 09:06 AM
finsruskw finsruskw is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,412
Default

Picked this up last spring after chasing it on E-bay till the rebates kicked in and I'm lovin' it. 3500 Cummins powered Laramie Longhorn. Gets 14+ mpg hauling a 1181 Lance truck camper around.

Owned Chrysler products for 55 years now, period.
It' MoPar or NoCar!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Ram 3500.jpg (24.4 KB, 103 views)
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-21-2016, 09:37 AM
Rmowl's Avatar
Rmowl Rmowl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Keedysville, MD
Posts: 680
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guitar Guy View Post
Thanks very much for the replies, folks. Very useful info., and lots to consider before I decide. I'm leaning toward Chevy / GMC, at this point, mainly because I've owned GM cars and trucks for most of my life. I like my little GMC Sonoma, and the interiors seem to be a little more high end.

I search far and wide to get low mileage used vehicles, and usually have pretty good luck. I take good care of my vehicles, with proper maintenance, waxing the exterior, and oiling the underside to protect from salt. I usually find garage kept & well maintained vehicles, around 10 yrs old, take good care of them while I drive them for 3 to 5 yrs, then get decent resale value. I rarely ever have a car payment, and insurance rates are kept lower.

JT
Not sure when the GM trucks went back to rear drums but that's something to watch for, can't quite figure that one out. My father in laws loaded 271 Silverado 2011 has rear drums. As has been mentioned here dodges are notorious for cancer, particularly the bottoms of the doors. And the automatic transmissions are less than stellar. I only drive a dodge because it has a cummins in it. The 1500 dodges switched to 3rd gen body style in 02, and IFS which I'm not a fan of but rides nice and for a 1\2 ton not a big deal.
You definitely got the right idea of buying a vehicle. Good luck in whatever you choose.
__________________
-Rick
IH 782
IH 126
CCC 1863
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-21-2016, 10:10 AM
titleist1 titleist1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: AZ
Posts: 97
Default

I've have an '03 Silverado 2wd, ext cab with the 4.8 8cyl. Very few issues in the 230000+ miles. Early on the cat conv went bad and was replaced at about 40k, the replacement is still in there. One of the computers went bad at about 50k and was covered by warranty, it was one of the non-recall / recalls they do if it is for other work but mine happened to go bad on the side of 495.

Other than regular maintenance I had a fuel pump and water pump replaced at about 180k and the brake lines rusted out and had to be replaced.

I hope to get another 3 years out of it, but I would buy another GM as I really like the 4.8, enough power for my occasional towing of tractors and gets about 19mpg.

Only one rust issue is on the passenger rear wheel well about the size of three quarters side to side.

The transmission is a little rough going from 1st to 2nd early on cold mornings but i take it easy until it warms up. I am very careful about the weight I tow now since i don't want a big bill surprising me.

Really got a workout towing a loader I found recently but the tranny seems to have survived the strain.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-21-2016, 04:05 PM
Vin122's Avatar
Vin122 Vin122 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hammond, WI
Posts: 71
Default

Chevy all the way or GMC. Way more comfortable riding vehicle, and like everyone else says the 5.3 is a great engine.

I'd recommend a Chevy Avalanche too - I've driven an '05 for 5 years now and I think my next vehicle will be a newer Avalanche. It's currently hooked to my trailer with a Cub Cadet 149 on on the trailer. I've hauled everything from my Son's '04 Duramax(wow was that heavy), to an empty trailer to my 36' travel trailer with my Avalanche. Its never let me down. It's going to need tires soon, do I install new tires or is it time to buy another Avalanche? Probably should go with tires... It has 200xxx miles and it sill going strong.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-21-2016, 04:14 PM
jimbob200521's Avatar
jimbob200521 jimbob200521 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Sterling, IL
Posts: 3,626
Default

Another vote for the Chevy/GMC camp. I love love love my 2001 1500 Silverado with the 5.3. Plenty of oomph for whatever I've needed it to do and she has just been reliable. No complaints here.
__________________
-Ryan

Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-21-2016, 10:01 PM
SS5150's Avatar
SS5150 SS5150 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Spring Grove, Illinois
Posts: 499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rmowl View Post
Not sure when the GM trucks went back to rear drums but that's something to watch for, can't quite figure that one out. My father in laws loaded 271 Silverado 2011 has rear drums. As has been mentioned here dodges are notorious for cancer, particularly the bottoms of the doors. And the automatic transmissions are less than stellar. I only drive a dodge because it has a cummins in it. The 1500 dodges switched to 3rd gen body style in 02, and IFS which I'm not a fan of but rides nice and for a 1\2 ton not a big deal.
You definitely got the right idea of buying a vehicle. Good luck in whatever you choose.
Back to rear drums in '05, complaints of poor brake pedal feel with the discs.
__________________
RUN IN THE RED
782 w/50c deck (red); 782 dual stick, 44c deck (y/w);
1050 w/38c deck; 1864 w/54" GT deck;
1872 project
Cub Cadet Pro Z 560 L
42" power angle snowblade, #2 tiller, 2-QA42a snowthrowers, 450 thrower, #2 cart; 54" Haban blade; Brinly box blade, 48" dethatcher, moldboard plow; Agri-Fab sweeper
1200, 1863, 1864 parts machines
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-21-2016, 11:01 PM
cubby102's Avatar
cubby102 cubby102 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Kewanee, Illinois
Posts: 1,976
Default

The truck I just recently got rid off simple to downsize and get a but more milage was a 1998 gmc k1500. Was what was called a "heavy half" while it was a half ton trucked it's frame was boxed almost all the way as well as had the heavier 14 bolt non floater rear axle (standard 14 bolt was full float) . Had a 4 bolt main roller cam vortec 350 with a 4l80e transmission floor shift tcase. G80 locker in the rear. Weighed in at just over 6000 lbs it was extended cab short bed. Loved every bit of that truck and usualy got around 18mpg highway unloaded.... had a little over 451k on it when I sold it to my buddy a little over a year ago and I'm sure he's approaching 500 by now he drives it daily. Options is what really makes a vehicle and good maintenence. I can be 95% sure any of the half ton vehicles sold now will perform just as good as any of us need them to. Figure out what your wanting it to do and go from there. Look at the problems of the trucks your interested in have. Every manufactures have its pros and cons. Just have to see which ones outweigh the next...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.