Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

P&K Cub Cadet Machtech Direct

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Attention Guest, We have turned off the forum to guest. This is due to bots attacking the site. It is still free to register.

-->
Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Off Topic > General Talk

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-04-2016, 12:35 PM
OldSkull's Avatar
OldSkull OldSkull is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Quebec
Posts: 1,101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ambrola View Post
So what would you think it would cost in electricity? Has to be cheaper than gas. I wish VW still made the Jetta TDI, I would buy another one today. I frigging hate to buy gas, as you guys can tell. The Jetta Diesel I bought in 2006 has been by far the best car I have ever bought. And it gets close to 50 mpg. My truck gets 20. I fill it up at least once a week. It's not bad now, but when gas hit 5 bucks a gallon, it sucked.
Ronnie.

The top fossil fuel is diesel, nothing can beat the efficiency of a diesel engine, that's the only fossil based fuel who can produce 138,700 BTU per US gallon.

The problem we face today is the new pollution control system used on those engine kill them, a new VW tdi will never last more then 200,000 Miles without major work unless you reprogram the ECM with a flash tool (Cheating)
You end up with more power, greater economy but you need to flash the ECM back to his OEM programing before you pass a pollution control, some have only add 5 gallons of B20 and apparently it work for them...

After many complaint from firework and emergency hospital transport department about equipment stalling on duty, the EPA allow emergency vehicles constructors to remove those crappy pollution control system. For those who don't know yet, all military equipment have no pollution control system since day one! Getting stock under heavy fire with a Humvee add a bit of stress to your duty they says...
__________________
Gilles.
1988 2072 401 54" hyd angled blade
1988 1872 364 snowblower/C50 deck
1976 1650/QA42A blower/44A deck/standby
1976 1450TS/Sleeve hitch/44A deck/in storage
1963 100 (red)/in storage
2010 Kubota 2380-2/42" infinity deck (engine swap)
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-04-2016, 03:38 PM
Berwil's Avatar
Berwil Berwil is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 1,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sir_lancealot View Post
I should have specified more clearly... it takes 3 hours to charge the 115 miles you drove that day. Not an empty to full charge.
According to this article, a 240volt-30amp power cord will charge 30 miles in an hr, so it's closer to 4 hours for a 115 mile charge. 240 x 30 = 7200 watts or 7.2 kW. If electric cost $0.10/kW, 7.2x.1= $.72 an hr to charge your car. It would cost $2.88 to go 115 mile everyday. Generally, circuits are only loaded to %60 ampacity for continuous loads, so realistically it's probably closer to $1.73 for 115 miles.

This of course is after you buy the more expensive electric car, the $600+ power cord (charger) and pay someone (like me) to wire it up in your garage.

http://www.plugincars.com/quick-guid...er-126875.html

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-04-2016, 05:16 PM
Billy-O's Avatar
Billy-O Billy-O is online now
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,936
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mech View Post
Billy, maybe it will charge faster if you use your generator on full power......

You are the electronic wizzard.
Switched to 240 volts for sure!
__________________
Two 125's and a 124 all with 42" decks
Plow blade
#2 Cart
QA36 snowthower
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-05-2016, 09:38 AM
drcjv's Avatar
drcjv drcjv is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 610
Default

I know the original question seemed to be for suggestions on a reliable and economical car. I love Cub Cadets and it is a great hobby but my real passion is cars. I understand the concern for reliability and economy but I have never bought a vehicle for those reasons. I agree reliability is important but in all the cars I have owned none have ever really been a problem as far as that goes. The majority have been one brand and maybe that's why. I'm sure I will get killed on this statement but I buy cars first by how they look. If it's ugly I don't want to drive it. I understand this is very subjective. Next I look at options and performance. Last night we drove about 2 hours to a Trump rally. ( by the way an unbelievable event I was amazed at the # of young people and women there 18,000 total). I drove my wife's MKS this car is an absolute pleasure to drive heated/cooled seats, Nav, adaptive cruise control with the power of a 70's muscle car. I have never once bought a car that I even looked at gas mileage I could not even tell you what my current cars get. I guess if I had a long commute I would consider MPG but I have never had to drive more than about 8 miles to work. I still have the first car I bought 38 years ago a 1965 mustang. Does any others out there consider looks, options and performance.
__________________
Charles________________________
1572 3pnt, rear PTO, 50" deck
1772 3pnt 50" deck, Brinly Plow, 54" Power angle plow
1872 3pnt, 44" deck, Brinly Plow, 54" Power Angle Plow
2072 3pnt 50" deck, Brinly Plow
2072 50" deck
Cub Cadet Tank 50 Zero Turn
Cub Cadet 33" Commercial Walk Behind
1953 Ih Cub with just about every implement
New Holland TC33D with Loader and Backhoe
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-05-2016, 10:34 AM
OldSkull's Avatar
OldSkull OldSkull is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Quebec
Posts: 1,101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drcjv View Post
Does any others out there consider looks, options and performance.
We all do but today technology bring his share of expensive problems and no one want to be the Ginny pig! When I purchase a new Korean Hyundai for my girlfriend I consider a lot more then how he look. I consider the cost of his maintenance, GMC charge me $200 for a oil change in my SUV and if I don't use their oil they void my warranty!

Just ask a Chrysler dealer how much it cost to do a transmission oil change on a Dodge Ram EcoDiesel but hang on something before you ask...I give you a hint..The pan and filter are a single part made of plastic and need to be replace. No warranty covering since it's "Normal" maintenance.

Trust me on that one, the first thing you should consider buying a new car is his maintenance cost.

In Ol' George style sayin!

"She may look good, but it still a hooker..."
__________________
Gilles.
1988 2072 401 54" hyd angled blade
1988 1872 364 snowblower/C50 deck
1976 1650/QA42A blower/44A deck/standby
1976 1450TS/Sleeve hitch/44A deck/in storage
1963 100 (red)/in storage
2010 Kubota 2380-2/42" infinity deck (engine swap)
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-05-2016, 12:08 PM
drcjv's Avatar
drcjv drcjv is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 610
Default

Skull you make perfect sense. If there was an issue with a vehicles maintenance I would want to know. I guess I have been lucky and not had any of these issues over the years.
__________________
Charles________________________
1572 3pnt, rear PTO, 50" deck
1772 3pnt 50" deck, Brinly Plow, 54" Power angle plow
1872 3pnt, 44" deck, Brinly Plow, 54" Power Angle Plow
2072 3pnt 50" deck, Brinly Plow
2072 50" deck
Cub Cadet Tank 50 Zero Turn
Cub Cadet 33" Commercial Walk Behind
1953 Ih Cub with just about every implement
New Holland TC33D with Loader and Backhoe
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-05-2016, 02:50 PM
ambrola's Avatar
ambrola ambrola is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: NC
Posts: 800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drcjv View Post
I know the original question seemed to be for suggestions on a reliable and economical car. I love Cub Cadets and it is a great hobby but my real passion is cars. I understand the concern for reliability and economy but I have never bought a vehicle for those reasons. I agree reliability is important but in all the cars I have owned none have ever really been a problem as far as that goes. The majority have been one brand and maybe that's why. I'm sure I will get killed on this statement but I buy cars first by how they look. If it's ugly I don't want to drive it. I understand this is very subjective. Next I look at options and performance. Last night we drove about 2 hours to a Trump rally. ( by the way an unbelievable event I was amazed at the # of young people and women there 18,000 total). I drove my wife's MKS this car is an absolute pleasure to drive heated/cooled seats, Nav, adaptive cruise control with the power of a 70's muscle car. I have never once bought a car that I even looked at gas mileage I could not even tell you what my current cars get. I guess if I had a long commute I would consider MPG but I have never had to drive more than about 8 miles to work. I still have the first car I bought 38 years ago a 1965 mustang. Does any others out there consider looks, options and performance.
Don't get me wrong here Charles. I also buy what I like no matter the cost of gas. But my truck isn't the vehicle that gets driven by Momma? I have always picked out the car for her, I don't remember if she has ever seen what I was buying until it showed up in the driveway. The Diesel VW Jetta is by far the best car we have ever had, low cost all the way around. It has never failed her and has plenty of life still in it. I want a car that is fuel efficient, and low cost on maintenance. I still love my old car, a 1967 RS Camaro that I will have forever, but it don't get much action.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-05-2016, 02:54 PM
ambrola's Avatar
ambrola ambrola is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: NC
Posts: 800
Default

I don't know what happened to my big picture?

Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-05-2016, 04:04 PM
litlmikeyl's Avatar
litlmikeyl litlmikeyl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sir_lancealot View Post
The Jetta got higher actual MPG because of the emission cheating they did.
We have one of those "bad" diesels and besides beings just a little on the small side, it's been a great car. We've put 36k on it on 20 months of owning it. We're waiting to see what the "fix" is from VW before we decide to do/not do the buyback deal. I'm leaning towards keeping it for now.

We did look at the Chevy Cruze with the oil burner but the price difference between it and the VW was a shock, so we got the VW.

The "fix" is to be submitted to the EPA & CARB on Nov. 11th and they have 45 days to approve it. If they do approve, all of the brand new V-dubs will not only get the fix, but a nearly ridiculous warranty and a big price drop over MSRP. My dealer is thinking in the 8-10k range for a price break.

Even with all that's happened with the Dieselgate mess, I'd buy another VW.

We also gave a '13 Ford Flex SEL AWD non-turbo that I daily drive and couldn't be happier with. Lots of room, stout, pull 5k lbs. Gets low 20's for mileage but it only goes 10 miles round trip a day for me to work & back.

The Flex has been a nice enough car overall that I'll probably never go back to GM as the fit & finish of the Ford is, IMO, as good as GM.
__________________
Mike - Ramsey, MN
'65 100 - #126432

Options: V61's, 8.5" Tru-Powers, stock sleeve hitch, Xtreme sleeve hitch adapter
Attachments: Dad's 42" Dozer Blade & 38" 3-spindle deck, 42U deck, Homemade Sleeve Hitch Dethatcher & a QA36A Snowthrower
Mods: K301 Upgrade, IHinIN's clutch pivot upgrade, SST driveshaft, custom bar axles

"Why buy something shiny & new when you can save something old."
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-05-2016, 04:26 PM
drcjv's Avatar
drcjv drcjv is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 610
Default

Ronnie the 67 looks great. You need to drive it. We are only here for a short time.
__________________
Charles________________________
1572 3pnt, rear PTO, 50" deck
1772 3pnt 50" deck, Brinly Plow, 54" Power angle plow
1872 3pnt, 44" deck, Brinly Plow, 54" Power Angle Plow
2072 3pnt 50" deck, Brinly Plow
2072 50" deck
Cub Cadet Tank 50 Zero Turn
Cub Cadet 33" Commercial Walk Behind
1953 Ih Cub with just about every implement
New Holland TC33D with Loader and Backhoe
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.